Become an OC Media MemberSupport independent journalism in the Caucasus:
Join Today
Media logo
1 March 2008

Families of Armenia’s 1 March massacre victims boycott court

Screenshot of live-stream of 1 March case plaintiff press conference.
Screenshot of live-stream of 1 March case plaintiff press conference.

The family members of protesters slain during post-electoral unrest in Armenia on 1 March 2008 have announced that they will be boycotting Robert Kocharyan’s trial after criticising the supposed ineffectuality of the proceedings. 

The boycott was announced during a press conference on Monday.  

The case concerns a crackdown on anti-government protests following the election of Serzh Sargsyan to the presidency which left 10 dead and over 100 injured.

Former President Robert Kocharyan, who was the outgoing president at the time, stands accused of ‘overthrowing the constitutional order’ for his role in suppressing the unrest. He is accused of illegally involving the armed forces and breaching the Armenian constitution. If convicted he faces 10 to 15 years in prison. 

In addition to Kocharyan, several high-ranking officials, including former Defence Minister Seyran Ohanyan and former General Chief of Staff of the Armed Forces Yuri Khachaturov have also been charged in relation with the 1 March events. 

Each of the accused is to be tried separately. Despite the boycott by the plaintiffs, the trial against Robert Kocharyan will continue. 

‘It’s a cheap show’ 

During the press conference, Tigran Yegoryan, one of the lawyers representing the families of the victims, stated that they would no longer attend hearings which he has said are ‘without content’.

‘There is no trial,’ said Yegoryan during the press conference. ‘It’s a cheap show.’ Meanwhile, one speaker at the press conference warned that if the situation was not resolved, ‘the consequences will be dire, for us all’.

Issues raised during the press conference included the disappearance of case-relevant documents from the National Security Service (NSS) which, according to the speakers, were a result of state bodies not cooperating with each other and, instead, sabotaging each other. 

One of the lawyers for the plaintiffs, Seda Safaryan, claimed that for the past two years information has been leaked from the NSS which has negatively affected the work of the Special Investigative Services which is in charge of the case.

The former head of the NSS, Artur Vanetsyan was forced to resign from his position in September 2019, after the country’s ruling authorities insinuated he had improper ties with Robert Kocharyan. 

Safaryan said his removal did not go far enough. 

‘There have been attempts at the state level to fix this issue’, Safaryan said.  ‘But appointing someone new doesn’t mean you’ve changed your staff.’ 

The lawyers clarified that they did not underestimate their role in the case, however, they no longer wished to take part in a trial which had become ‘repetitive and deviated from the main case at hand.’ 

‘There can be no plaintiff’

In an interview with the Armenian Times, one of Kocharyan’s lawyers, Aram Vardevanyan, said that he could not  ‘give an objective opinion’ on the statements made during the press conference. 

However, Vardevanyan did say that it is normal for cases of such importance to proceed slowly. As an example, he brought up the case of the 2016 police station attack by the Sasna Dzrer (Daredevils of Sasun) which has not yet been resolved. He also denied claims of filing spurious appeals, stating that all of the appeals issued by Kocharyan’s legal team had relevance to the case. 

One of the most recent appeals made by the ex-president’s lawyers included one in which they asked the court to strip the plaintiffs from their status as plaintiffs and exclude them from the case. They claimed that since the charge against Kocharyan involves ‘overthrowing the constitutional order,’ then there can be no, in fact, be no plaintiffs, as they did not suffer damages due to the charge in question. 

Anna Danibekyan, the judge presiding over the case, denied the appeal. 

 

Related Articles

1 March 2008

Test (Followed author)

Avatar

I should receive email notification about it I should receive email notification about it I should receive email notification about it I should receive email notification about it I should receive email notification about it I should receive email notification about it I should receive email notification about it I should receive email notification about it I should receive email notification about it I should receive email notification about it I should receive email notification about it I sho

1 March 2008

(Test) Abkhazians follow Georgia’s elections closely, but quietly

Avatar

Behind closed doors, Abkhazians are watching the results of the Georgian parliamentary elections and analysing the allegations of irregularities. Opinions are divided on what the current electoral impasse — and a possible rapprochement with Russia — could mean for Abkhazia. As the fallout of Georgia’s parliamentary elections and subsequent allegations of widespread fraud continue, a different picture is emerging in Abkhazia. Ahead of the election, authorities in Abkhazia and South Ossetia clos

1 March 2008

(Test) Editorial | Georgia’s rigged election

Avatar

Georgia’s parliamentary elections were neither free nor fair, and with overwhelming evidence that the vote was rigged, the elections, and the incoming government, cannot be considered legitimate. When Georgians went to the polls on 26 October to elect a new parliament, they did so in an environment of fear mongering and intimidation, and one with a myriad of new repressive laws in place. The ruling party centred its campaign on their claim that an opposition victory would mean war with Russia

1 March 2008

(Test) Georgian Dream accused of omitting Abkhazia and South Ossetia from Georgia map

Avatar

5039233e 5269 4986 b653 0447fab4eead0:00/2:271× Georgian Dream has been accused of displaying a map of Georgia excluding Abkhazia and South Ossetia. They have since argued that the regions were outlined in grey, rendering them barely visible to cameras. The map was part of a presentation given by Parliamentary Speaker Shalva Papuashvili about his party’s deployment of specially appointed delegates to electoral districts throughout Georgia, in an apparent attempt to counter allegations of using

Most Popular

Editor‘s Picks